Re: Intent to hijack Bacula (Heads up, Get The Facts!) (long)
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Frost <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > * Turbo Fredriksson (email@example.com) wrote:
> >> But regarding the build system, I REALLY object to any major changes! Fixes yes,
> >> but not REPLACEMENT!!
> > Uhh, or, not... Sorry, but the build system was terrible and is
> > certainly something which should not be encouraged.
> Rubish! There is nothing (major) wrong with it as it is now. Yes, hardcoding
> isn't good, but neither is 'an-hour-build'. Which you'd get if you do three
> full builds after each other...
I suggest you look at ccache. This will take care of avoiding spurious
recompilation without changing the build system.
Imagine a large red swirl here.