[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alternatives and priorities

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:28:30PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:

> >  Using popcon would ensure that the applications which most people
> >  prefer would be the default; this is a fair and objective criterion.
> Interesting idea, but by my reckoning that would make "ed" the default
> editor for most people, which I don't think is a good idea:
> 	    <http://popcon.debian.org/main/editors/by_inst>

If you look at by_vote [0] the situation is different:

[0] which seems more relevant to me:
#<inst> is the number of people who installed this package;
#<vote> is the number of people who use this package regularly;

 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Janis Joplin & Big Brother And: Summertime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: