Re: mdadm 2.4.1-1 ready for tests
martin f krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> also sprach Simon Huggins <email@example.com> [2006.05.17.1029 -0500]:
>> I know this isn't the sort of feedback you want but these aren't
>> all "please ship the new version of mdadm" bugs and whilst they
>> might well be fixed by this version I thought consensus was to try
>> to describe what it was about this release that fixes these bugs.
> Mh. I don't want to (re)start a flamewar, but my take is that
> changelog.Debian documents changes I've made, and the upstream
> changelog documents the changes they've made.
No need to restart the discussion, because this has already been
discussed ad nauseam. The conclusion always was that you should give an
explanation to each bug you close. In doubt, the list archives will help...
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)