[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mdadm 2.4.1-1 ready for tests

also sprach Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> [2006.05.17.1029 -0500]:
> I know this isn't the sort of feedback you want but these aren't
> all "please ship the new version of mdadm" bugs and whilst they
> might well be fixed by this version I thought consensus was to try
> to describe what it was about this release that fixes these bugs.

Mh. I don't want to (re)start a flamewar, but my take is that
changelog.Debian documents changes I've made, and the upstream
changelog documents the changes they've made. I acknowledge these
changes by closing the bugs, and if you care how it got fixed, you
look at the upstream changelog. I just don't think there's a big
point in duplicating information in the Debian changelog.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
officer, arrest that man! he's whistling a copyrighted song.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: