Re: gcc 4.1 or not
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> > is going to ship with 2.3?
> what about the transition to libgnutls13 ? I noticed yesterday when
> debootstraping that we get libgnutls11, 12 AND 13 installed by default.
> Do we really need that many libgnutls ?
I don't see anything at all in the reverse-deps that would explain
libgnutls11 being pulled in by debootstrap. Is it still hard-coded in a
package list somewhere in the version of debootstrap you're using?
Anyway, it would be nice to get libgnutls11 out of etch completely, but
AFAICT it should at least have been removed from the list of base libs
already. If you wanted to file bugs and NMU (*not* 0-day NMUs) to take it
the rest of the way, that'd be great. :)
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.