Joe Smith wrote: > > "Andreas Tille" <tillea@rki.de> wrote in message > [🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0604222303360.10443@wr-linux02">news:[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0604222303360.10443@wr-linux02... > >> Hi, >> >> I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there >> was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had >> personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was >> asked to package the latest version and the library is probably >> not important enough to keep different versions and thus I will >> package version 0.5.2.0 that is the latest version avialable from >> http://www.eudoxos.de/gtk/gtkdatabox/ . My guess is that there >> is an ABI change involved and thus I have to rename the package >> to libgtkdatabox-0.5.2.0-X . My question is: What is the right >> choice for 'X' if I skipped several upstream versions inbetween? >> > > If this is your first upload of that version then X=1. > The correct list for these types of questions is > debian-mentors. > > I *think* that he has enough experience with Debian to know the correct list on which to ask a question: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=tille@debian.org -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature