Re: Lintian package-has-a-duplicate-relation

To: Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org>
Cc: rocheml@httrack.com, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lintian package-has-a-duplicate-relation
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:57:56 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 8764l9r5az.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060416094137.GA18401@fooishbar.org> (Daniel Stone's message of "Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:41:37 +0300")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10604161213100.23769-100000@linux.localnet> <[🔎] 20060416094137.GA18401@fooishbar.org>

* Daniel Stone:

> Why?  If your library's ABI is changing with every revision, you should
> be bumping the soversion.

Or you shouldn't provide a DSO at all.

Reply to:

References:
- Lintian package-has-a-duplicate-relation
  - From: rocheml@httrack.com
- Re: Lintian package-has-a-duplicate-relation
  - From: Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: libgtk2.0-0: changelog.Debian.gz is not an upstream changelog
Next by Date: Re: Bug#354674: What on earth?
Previous by thread: Re: Lintian package-has-a-duplicate-relation
Next by thread: Re: Lintian package-has-a-duplicate-relation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread