On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the > > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches? > > But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in > OpenSolaris-based derivatives, such as NexentaOS? And I'd like to > putback libxslt change (and similar) to upstream, so other derivative > will not be polluted with mis-provided packages. So why not have an OpenSolaris core set of metapackages, with a sunwlxsl package that Depends on libxslt1, instead of polluting every package with this port-specific stuff?
Description: Digital signature