[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: amd64 uploads



Le Dim 9 Avril 2006 14:18, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:47:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Ven 7 Avril 2006 20:33, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > > > A lot of the others simply need to desupport old versions of
> > > > Python.
> > >
> > > python2.1 and 2.2 are supposed to be removed soon, but both
> > > currently fail to build.  There are lots of packages that build
> > > depend on those that should get changed.  They all have open
> > > bugs.  I'd welcome anyone that fixes a few of those.
> >
> > what's the policy about them ?
> >
> > should the packages be built for python 2.3 and 2.4 ? only for 2.3
> > ? only for 2.4 ?
>
> I guess it depends on the package.  Currently the default seems
> to be 2.3, but if it supports multiple versions, adding 2.4
> probably won't hurt.
>
> > and currently bugs like #351145 are only normal bugs. is it okay to
> > nmu in delayed/7 without warning ?
>
> See:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/04/msg00005.html

okay, I've send delayed/7 NMUs for python packages in Dep-Wait of 
python2.{1,2}-dev. (actually I have still 5 to do, but that will be 
soon OK).

I've not touched decompyle2.2, boot-floppies, libapache{,2}-mod-python, 
that hadn't any bug open related to python2.1 and python2.2 drop. I've 
(currently at least) not opened bugs to those 4 packages, feel free to 
do so.

Cheers,
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpsm1Sd11oqO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: