Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture
I suppose porting glibc is quite important because it also minimises
the porting of everything else that may need to be adapted.
On 4/7/06, Martin Wuertele <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> * Andrew Donnellan <email@example.com> [2006-04-06 23:19]:
> > Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc.
> Which I think would be most beneficial as it additianaly would minimize
> the number of packages to add to the archive for the solaris port in
> case nexentas work should become a debian subproject one day (and iirc
> that was one of the goals).
> yours Martin
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> ---- Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
> * Joey notices Alfie can read manpages :-)
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
Jabber - firstname.lastname@example.org
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
OpenNIC user - http://www.opennic.unrated.net