Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> [2006-03-13 00:04]:
> > I am adding some additional archs to my local installation like
> > i386-uclibc, which makes hurd-i386 an exception to the rule of
> > having the CPU arch first and the OS name the next.
> There's also kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}, so why don't you use uclibc-i386?
Actually, I disagree. To me it makes perfect sense the way it
currently is, namely:
kernel-arch-libc
kernel and libc can be empty when they're the default (Linux and
glibc respectively).
The uclibc port uses Linux so I think i386-uclibc is fine. There
could be kfreebsd-i386-uclibc in the future, I suppose, or something
like that.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to: