Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2006-03-12 kello 15:49 +0100, Peter Kourzanov kirjoitti:Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386 rather that i386-hurd?I guess it just happened to seem like a good name at the time. Why, is there a problem with the name? Does it matter? Debian architecture names are, after all, pretty much atomic and unparseable.
Well, I am in the process of adding more architectures like i386-uclibc, and this order (CPU-OS) seems more logical to me that the reverse (hurd-i386).