Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> >Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1. I'm filing this bug as
> >important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in
> >unstable (probably in a few weeks) I'll upgrade this to serious.
> >
> >
> Jeez, according to my available list, gcc-4.1 is not even in sid, yet.
Correct. It is in experimental though.
> We are duplicating efforts since patches for gcc-4.1 have been applied
> upstream and I'm aware of them since a while ago.
>
> Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play
> with that compiler a bit before making it the default.
That's what we're doing.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part