Re: Propose exim4 for debian-volatile (Was: exim4_4.50-8sarge1)
* Adeodato Simó (firstname.lastname@example.org) [060305 14:44]:
> * Andreas Barth [Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:16:50 +0100]:
> > Well, if s-p-u would *only* contained approved packages for the next
> > point release, I would agree with you. However, s-p-u contains any kind
> > of packages right now.
> Right, I've always thought it'd be useful to have a place to make
> _accepted_ s-p-u uploads available (read: those that'll be in the next
> stable point release fore sure). Currently s-p-u is not that place,
> nor is debian-volatile as per its definition, but _maybe_ the exim4
> issue is important enough as to make the volatile archive admins
> consider an exception.
The plan is to make s-p-u such a place, but until it happens, I think
volatile can have such packages as an exception, if the bug is severe