Re: debconf and cdebconf are coinstallable now
Martin Michlmayr <email@example.com> writes:
> * Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006-03-02 05:08]:
>> Joey has been campaigning  for a while to get everything in the
>> archive changed to depend on debconf | debconf-2.0 or similar rather
>> than just debconf, in order that we can start rolling out cdebconf
>> as its replacement.
> It would be nice if you could tell _why_ you're interested in
> migrating to cdebconf. What does it have that debconf doesn't, or
> what other advantages does it have? Is it easier to maintain,
> smaller, ...?
Two reasons I can think of: Its smaller, and it does not depend on perl.