Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
Stephen Gran <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>> The reason this interests me is that this seems to be the key
>> question; it seems to me that if something is *now* not useful for
>> free-software-only systems, it might be better placed in contrib (and
>> the installer fixed, and perhaps not placed in contrib until after the
>> installer is fixed), and only moved to main if/when there is a reason.
> I'm guessing this thread reset means you didn't like the answers you
> were getting?
No, it's that people kept on refusing to answer simple questions, and
after a bit of that, they said they had already answered them (when
they in fact had not), and now they complain that it's a "thread
reset" to continue to ask the questions.
Look, if the position is that ndiswrapper is, at present, only useful
with non-free software, but it should, even so, be in Debian main, I'm
prepared to entertain that possibility. But I can't even figure out
what you *are* saying, because everytime I ask, people start getting