[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question


I hereby appeal to the technical committee to reject to rule on this
request, on the grounds that this is not a technical matter, and
therefore falls outside the authority of the technical committee.

The question at hand is whether the statement "this package is not
useful without non-free software, even though it will run without
non-free software" is relevant wrt the requirement which is in Policy
that no package in main must require any package outside of main to be
built or executed. This is not a technical issue; it is simply a matter
of interpretation of the social contract--which is clearly not a
technical issue.

The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
or, failing that (since I believe we have no such body), a General

Fun will now commence
  -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: