Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:23:05PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:48:51PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> The question is not whether there is such a dependency declared; the
> >> question is whether the software is useful without the use of non-free
> >> software.
> >
> > All right, who pushed the 'thread reset' button?
>
> Unlike some, I do not have a perfect memory. Moreover, I do not
> appreciate vague "we already discussed this" references. I've read
> the damn thread; I ask the question because the previous discussion
> did not seem to actually *answer* the question.
It's been answered a zillion times already, you just didn't accept the
answer as valid. That's okay, but re-asking it again and again isn't
going to give you a different answer.
Can you please agree to disagree already?
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
Reply to: