[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main

On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 11:34 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 19, Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> wrote:
> > Nevertheless, if you think abiword and openoffice.org should be moved then go
> > for it.  Just don't use them as excuse to turn warez wrappers into "generic"
> > driver interfaces.
> No excuses are needed, the definition of contrib is enough and
> ndiswrapper has been uploaded to main using the same criteria which have
> been used in the past for emulators. Stop rewriting history.
> Please also stop insulting ndiswrapper users and developers by calling
> it a "warez wrapper".

And for fuck's sake, stop filling up my inbox w/ this crap.  I'm not
doing a thing unless either a) you people come to a consensus on the
issue (which you have not in the past threads, and probably never will),
or b) a governing body like the ctte tells me that it should be in
contrib.  Otherwise, it's staying right where it is.  Honestly, I could
care less whether it's in contrib or main, but it was a decision that
was made long ago, and I see no reason to make the change.

Robert, don't you have better things to do w/ your time?  Go fix cdbs
bugs or something.  David Nusinow requested help w/ xorg 7.0 packaging;
maybe you should help him out.  I'm sick and tired of these pointless

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: