[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: update-inetd and xinetd

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:37:26AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:

> I realise that update-inetd needs to be more flexible than just servicing
> xinetd and netkit-inetd style configurations though...

What do you mean by "more flexible"? IMHO update-inetd should implement
just the minimum needed for package management purposes
(adding/removing/enabling/disabling a service).


     MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Reply to: