Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:36:54PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > [Christopher Martin]
> >> If an issue is highly controversial, then I can think of no better
> >> way of settling it in a way that most developers will accept than a
> >> vote. People respect votes much more than decrees, even if they don't
> >> agree with them.
> > And yet in this very thread we *still* have people whinging about GR
> > 2004-03 being "deceptive". (Yes, *after* you all had the opportunity
> > in 2004-04 to repeal it, and didn't do so.) Either astounding or
> > depressing.
> Has anyone come forward and said "I was deceived by GR 2004-03"? I
> wonder. I don't recall anyone saying that.
Jerôme Marant, in this very thread, in a message you replied to (though
he did not do so with the exact phrase above).
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4