Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:22:34PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Several folks seem to wish to re-ignite the debate of whether or not
> the changes were "editorial" or not. Whether it was or was not, it's
> now over and done with. This GR is a separate, albeit related, issue.
The changes could only have been referred to as 'editorial' if wide consensus
and understanding had already been reached about their effects.
I think it's fair to say that this was not the case at the time.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>
Reply to: