Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On Feb 09, Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Definition 1. is precise, definition 2. is not (PostScript, pseudocode,
> > Unfortunately, definition #2 is the one which almost everybody agreed to
> How so? Is there any document in Debian, stating that "software" follows
> definition 2?
No, it was just how the ftpmasters and everybody else interested applied
it, and how it was explained when somebody asked about it.
> BTW, taking this classification, where do you put PostScript files --
> software or documentation?
Usually they are both, software (possibly trivial) and data in the same
file.
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>