Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

[md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)]

On Feb 09, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:

> This was necessary only because the release manager believed the changes
> to be non-editorial. I cannot even understand an interpretation of the
> old wording that can lead us to accept non-free documentation into main.
This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an
interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to
accept non-free documentation into main.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature