Re: timezone data packaged separately and in volatile?
* Ian Jackson wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > The requirements for getting into a stable release update are not
> > black magic, they're quite well known:
> > http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.1r1/
> 2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data loss,
> data corruption, or an overly broken system, or the package is broken
> or not usable (anymore).
That's why I'm wondering abount the mutt 1.5.9-2sarge1 reject... it
also fixes possible data loss.