[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run vs. /lib/run

On Wednesday 25 January 2006 22:40, Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Tim Cutts wrote:
> > [...] In my case I was mounting /var/run
> > and /var/lock as  tmpfs filesystems all the time to reduce hard disk
> > access on a machine that was running all the time.
> Ubuntu is already mounting tmpfs's on /var/lock and /var/run.  It's a
> reasonable thing to do and we should support it.  That means that
> packages using these directories should create any subdirectories they
> need.

It's convenient that they did it first, now we can copy them with less 
breakage expected.

Are there any other related things that we should be copying from them?

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: