Re: /run vs. /lib/run
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 22:40, Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Tim Cutts wrote:
> > [...] In my case I was mounting /var/run
> > and /var/lock as tmpfs filesystems all the time to reduce hard disk
> > access on a machine that was running all the time.
>
> Ubuntu is already mounting tmpfs's on /var/lock and /var/run. It's a
> reasonable thing to do and we should support it. That means that
> packages using these directories should create any subdirectories they
> need.
It's convenient that they did it first, now we can copy them with less
breakage expected.
Are there any other related things that we should be copying from them?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: