[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:45:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:26 -0500, Christopher Martin
> <chrsmrtn@debian.org> said:  
> > So let's start again. Let's say that someone tried put forward a new
> > amendment in place of the old. This amendment makes clear its
> > intention to assert the position of the Debian Project as viewing
> > the GFDL, minus invariant sections, to be sufficiently free to meet
> > the DFSG and be included in main. Would you accept the amendment?
> > Given all my arguments in previous posts, would you require a
> > supermajority for the amendment to pass?
>         If you want to override the delegates decision that works
>  licensed under the GFDL are incontrovertibly non-free, that is a
>  separate GR.  

Why should it be a separate GR? That's seems both unnecessary and a bad
idea; what's the point in overriding decisions about the GFDL, if it is
then declared non-free anyway?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: