On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:27:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:26:25AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:35:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > I believe Ubuntu fills an important gap in the Debian world and as such > > > Ubuntu is not part of the Debian world, because it does not share the > > values that found Debian. > > That's kind of a strange position to take, isn't it? Does this mean that > the many users who use Debian directly sheerly on technical excellence > alone, without sharing Debian's "founding values", are not part of the > "Debian world"? For that matter, I don't know of any derivative Debian > distributions that require their developers to agree to the social contract; > so by that standard, are *any* of them part of the "Debian world"? Intuitively, I would not expect any standard to classify any of the current derivatives as 'part of the Debian world'. We have very little interaction with any of them. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature