Re: buildd administration
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:24:00 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG
<tb@becket.net> wrote:
>An excellent example of this is the publication of the NEW queue. Now
>that everyone can see the NEW queue, I don't see any of the big public
>criticism about slow processing.
I have to disagree here. Things have improved _greatly_ after Ganneff
was added to the ftp-master team. This might have been a coincidence
with the NEW publication, but the real improvement there is Ganneff.
>> (BTW, I see #335981 and #336371 haven't received a response since late
>> October; or has raptor been down that entire time, so that you haven't been
>> able to diagnose it further -- it certainly seems down now?)
>
>Upstream is working on #335981 and #336371. In fact, scm has *never*
>supported s390; when I took over maintenance of the package I opened
>the bugs so that it could be more effectively tracked.
>
>And since I am the one who opened #335981, I don't really think a
>reply to myself is all that necessary.
I disagree. The BTS is a public repository, available to the general
public. If there is more information to a bug available, the BTS is
the place where it should be.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: