Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:11:01 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2005.07.10.09.11.01.792203@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 200507100157.54482.neroden@twcny.rr.com>

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:57:54 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I suggested "Debian IV"

Are release numbers really needed?  Why not do away with them altogether?

-- 
Thomas Hood

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: Nigel Jones <nigelj@gmail.com>
- Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>

References:
- Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Rolex Replica Eliza
Next by Date: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Previous by thread: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Next by thread: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread