On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Then we would have > > Debian 4.0 for etch, 4.1 for etch stable release 1, 4.2 for etch stable > release 2, 4.2a for etch stable release 2 with a minor CD mastering fix > (for example), etc.pp. > > Does the release team agree with this change or do we need another > consensus (or even a GR)? this looks pretty reasonable to me, and makes the number versioning actually convey consistant information. i also liked the previous suggestion of using integral versions counting the "generation" of the debian release back to the first release. but then again, ianarm. sean --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature