[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?



[Drew Parsons]
> I remember some of us belatedly suggested sarge should be Debian 4.0,
> though it was too late (May?) to accept that.
> 
> I suppose we should decide now if etch is going to be 3.2 or 4.0.

First of all, it was not only too late, the talk would have been
pointless anyway, like it is now.  It's a small and arbitrary decision
the release managers get to make - and they're in a position to know in
great detail just how major or minor a release is.

I'm sure if they care about the opinions of the peanut gallery, they'll
ask.  In their shoes, *I* wouldn't care what J. Random Developer
thought.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: