On May 15, 2005, at 22:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
Still, the concerns about re-adding this software version (which has beenout of testing for months) via t-p-u remain.
Its hard to see it being any worse than freeswan, which has been abandoned for a while by its upstream. And if it turns out to be a problem, it could just be removed again, right?
racoon doesn't have all the features that freeswan and openswan have; not sure about isakmpd and pipsecd.