Re: dependencies on makedev
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages
> currently depending on it will add an alternative dependency to udev.
> Also, policy should be amended accordingly.
> The affected packages are:
Hmm, I have a package that depends on makedev (pbbuttonsd) and I was
wondering why it doesn't show up in your list? Maybe because it
is powerpc only? Or is there a "real" reason why I shouldn't add
an alternate dependency on udev?
Frank Lichtenheld <email@example.com>