Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:46:08 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1135863968.5563.104.camel@esme.liw.iki.fi>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrndr3ou2.b2n.jmm@inutil.org>
References: <[🔎] 1135123651.5624.63.camel@esme.liw.iki.fi> <[🔎] slrndr3ou2.b2n.jmm@inutil.org>

ke, 2005-12-28 kello 02:00 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti:
> Why don't we add a status field into the PTS, where a maintainer
> can denote her "NMU policy" for a given source package? E.g.
> a selection box, ranging from "Don't dare to touch this, I bite"
> to "Feel free to 0d-NMU for every severity as long a you send the
> patch". Or a free-form field, if that doesn't suffice.

I started a list on wiki.debian.org for people who welcome low threshold
NMUs for their packages.

http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu

-- 
When in doubt, use brute force.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
  - From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>

References:
- Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
  - From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@iki.fi>
- Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
  - From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#345160: ITP: libgpod -- a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod
Next by Date: Re: stable aliases for CD drives
Previous by thread: Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread