Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi? -> which editor should be standard?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi? -> which editor should be standard?
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:13:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200512241413.36048.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051224131513.GA9019@dumbo.lan.aokiconsulting.com>
References: <[🔎] 20051218183857.GA16162@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20051224131513.GA9019@dumbo.lan.aokiconsulting.com>

On Saturday 24 December 2005 14:15, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Sarge installer installs nano and nvi.  I thought it was sort of
> overlooked bug of installer.  nano and nvi are in /usr/bin.

s/installer/debootstrap/

And debootstrap just installs the base system based on package 
characteristics (mainly priority), so it all boils down again to the 
definition of the base system.

Cheers,
FJP

Attachment: pgpitnV6MauG2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Priority=important: elvis-tiny & nano-tiny / Priority=optional: nvi, vim-tiny, nano, elvis, vim
  - From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

References:
- switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi? -> which editor should be standard?
  - From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi? -> which editor should be standard?
Next by Date: Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
Previous by thread: Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi? -> which editor should be standard?
Next by thread: Priority=important: elvis-tiny & nano-tiny / Priority=optional: nvi, vim-tiny, nano, elvis, vim
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread