[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run vs /var/run

"jdthood@tiscali.nl" <jdthood@tiscali.nl> writes:

> Peter Samuelson wrote:
>> Given the need, and now the reality, of /run, is there any need for 
> a
>> separate /var/run?
> "Need" is probably too strong, but it's certainly convenient if we 
> don't
> have to change the way we currently use /var/run/.

How about "mount --bind /run /var/run"?

I think we should allow/plan for that, i.e. forbid name conflicts
between the two and such.


Reply to: