"jdthood@tiscali.nl" <jdthood@tiscali.nl> writes:
> Peter Samuelson wrote:
>> Given the need, and now the reality, of /run, is there any need for
> a
>> separate /var/run?
>
>
> "Need" is probably too strong, but it's certainly convenient if we
> don't
> have to change the way we currently use /var/run/.
How about "mount --bind /run /var/run"?
I think we should allow/plan for that, i.e. forbid name conflicts
between the two and such.
MfG
Goswin