Re: /run vs. /lib/run

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:44:41 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20051220014441.GC31981@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk>

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:12:37PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Any other defenders of /lib/run?  Of /run?

Heh. You know, you could've just said "Yes, my heart is set on /run"
right at the start and saved us all a lot of trouble...

Cheers,
aj

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /run vs. /lib/run
  - From: jdthood@82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl (Thomas Hood)
- Re: /run vs. /lib/run
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- /run vs. /lib/run
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?
Next by Date: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Previous by thread: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Next by thread: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread