Lars Wirzenius wrote: > In the name of reducing base's size, I would support a policy change > here, excempting vi clones, but I suspect I'd be shouted down. > Personally, I think "standard" would be the appropriate priority for for > the vi clone. In which case it wouldn't really reduce base's size, since standard is installed anyway on (most) systems. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature