Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:17:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20051218191705.GB13392@wonderland.linux.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43A5ACB1.60609@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 43A5ACB1.60609@yahoo.co.uk>

On Dec 18, Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> FWIW I asked Chris Yeoh for his opinion on the name and he said that
> /run sounded preferable to both /etc/run and /lib/run.
Competition with /root in tab-completion, for a start.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /run vs /var/run
  - From: Rich Walker <rw@shadow.org.uk>
- Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)
  - From: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>

References:
- Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?
Next by Date: Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)
Previous by thread: Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)
Next by thread: Re: /run vs /var/run
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread