[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: buildd administration

Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:51:06PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
>> > Rather, it seems much more likely that we would want to push such packages
>> > *out* of unstable.
>> Really?  So now, unstable should be maintained in a releasable state
>> *too*?
> Not necessarily; but as packages in testing can only arrive there after
> moving through unstable, unstable will need to be rather sane, too.

Explain why this is?  How does a package which is not yet releasable,
in unstable, cause a problem which requires pushing the package out of

Reply to: