On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:53:47AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <20051207080852.GA22413@tennyson.dodds.net> email@example.com writes: > >On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > >> I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results? > >> firstname.lastname@example.org seems to be a black hole. You'll need to find > >> someone willing to communicate with access to the buildd queues before > >> the porters can do anything. > > > >I said that deciding which packages should belong in P-a-s is porter work; > >as is filing bugs on failed packages that shouldn't, providing patches, and > >doing porter NMUs if necessary. > > Again: what can I do with such a list? See the list below. > > >If the porters do this effectively, there's really not much need at all for > >telling the buildd maintainers about transient build failures, because > >they'll be pretty obvious (and account for the majority of failures, as it > >should be). > > Just because it is obvious does not mean that the buildd adminstrator > does the correct thing. kq was "uploaded" 51 days ago, trustedqsl was > "uploaded" 25 days ago, neither is in the archive. > > openoffice.org has been "building" for 8 days, it only took 57 hours > on my slower than any current sparc buildd pbuilder. kexi has been > "building" for 6 days, it took less than 2 hours. Hi Blars et al., has anyone every considered a check in the buildd infrastructure to alert someone (buildd admin and/or others) if a build is taking too long (eg openoffice usually takes between 2-3 hours to build and the current build has been building for 10 hours+). Something like a database entry or a database of either previous build times or last build time. As a way to not have a buildd tied up with an obvious build issue and thus allow the issue to be address sooner thus alowing more buildd throughput. I'd help but I have neither the skill nor the access to buildd infrastrure (as I'm not a DD or a buildd admin) but try to give ideas that I feel are helpful. Anyway, hope those buildd (and thier admins) are humming along smoothly! Cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Description: Digital signature