Re: buildd administration
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:47:59PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:27:10 +0100, Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > Where should I best complain for your NM application to be
> > cancelled?
> Err, so if a NM candidate speaks as openly as some DD's do,
> they get threatened with having their applications cancelled because
> of them speaking their minds?
"I apologize for publically insulting people; I should
have found a better way to deal with their idiocy."
-- Nathanael Nerode
If he thinks he can resolve issues by flaming people publically on
debian-devel, then yes, I think we have different opinions about this
project and I would like to voice my concern. Obviously, my voice does
not hold any more weight than any other DD's, so I fail to see how this
is threatening in any way, unless no other DDs (or his AM) would support
him either. That I believe that other DDs should not flame on
debian-devel either is somewhat unrelated to this.
> What is this, a munich beer hall in 1933?
On a historical anecdote, most things in 1933 happenend in Berlin
already. Unless you consider how I live in Munich, which makes this
comment more appropriate as an ad-hominem attack, I guess.
<marcus> Jeroen: Is that your first big flamewar?