[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: buildd administration

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:47:59PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:27:10 +0100, Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> said: 
> > Where should I best complain for your NM application to be
> > cancelled?
>         Err, so if a NM candidate speaks as openly as some DD's do,
>  they get threatened with  having their applications cancelled because
>  of them speaking their minds? 

"I apologize for publically insulting people; I should
have found a better way to deal with their idiocy."
                -- Nathanael Nerode

If he thinks he can resolve issues by flaming people publically on
debian-devel, then yes, I think we have different opinions about this
project and I would like to voice my concern.  Obviously, my voice does
not hold any more weight than any other DD's, so I fail to see how this
is threatening in any way, unless no other DDs (or his AM) would support
him either.  That I believe that other DDs should not flame on
debian-devel either is somewhat unrelated to this.

> What is this, a munich beer hall in 1933?

On a historical anecdote, most things in 1933 happenend in Berlin
already.  Unless you consider how I live in Munich, which makes this
comment more appropriate as an ad-hominem attack, I guess.



<marcus> Jeroen: Is that your first big flamewar?

Reply to: