[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: buildd administration

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:27:10PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:52:31PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> > >I also see the keyring's been updated earlier this week, including
>> > >both a replacement key for Horms from late last month, and Chip's
>> > >requested updates.
>> > Indeed, complaining on debian-devel appears to get results, doesn't
>> > it?  At least, that's the conclusion that a rational outside observer
>> > would come to.  
>> Where should I best complain for your NM application to be cancelled?
> You can direct concerns about candidates to da-manager@debian.org, which
> will be taken into account when the AM's report is being evaluated. I
> presume it takes quite a few comments from different developers before
> those would override the AM's recommendation though.
> Positive comments can also be sent there (as an additional "advocate"
> round, I guess), and are AIUI particularly appreciated, since that gives
> more support to accepting a candidate, which is, after all, what almost
> always happens at that point.

For applicants that are not in the DAM queue (e.g. haven't been approved
by their AM), please send the comments to the AM (and maybe front desk)
instead.  These comments should then be included in the report submitted
by the AM.

Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

Reply to: