Re: StrongARM tactics
On Thursday 08 December 2005 04:41 am, you wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> > Thomas Viehmann <email@example.com> writes:
> >> +pcsx: i386 # i386 assembly
> > AFAICT, this is only because its Linux/Makefile forces CPU to ix86
> > unconditionally.
> Write patch. At a minimum the package should be "i386 amd64". In
> general anything with "Arch: i386" should add amd64.
PCSX 1.6 does not compile with GCC4 when the ix86 flag is not specified, even
on i386. I don't know about amd64, but my other partially-ASM (using NASM
like PCSX) package (libopenspc) will not build on amd64, so I'm assuming that
the same is true here -- I'll change it if someone can confirm that it will
build and work.
YOU RPN LOVE IF THEN HONK