[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] xulrunner, shlibs, and dependencies.

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> was heard to say:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Will all the tools resolving the dependencies be fine with a dependency
> > on a virtual package without one an a real package ? (like for
> > zlib1g-dev | libz-dev)
> Yes.  See apt's Provides for an example of this.

  Just in case there's any confusion: the problem with depending only on
a virtual package is that some tools tend to pick an arbitrary Provider of
the package, which can in turn lead to unpredictable behavior.  If only one
provider at a time is installable, this shouldn't be a problem, though.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: