Re: master's mail backlog and upgrade time
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: master's mail backlog and upgrade time
- From: paddy <paddy@panici.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:03:07 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20051202150256.GA3241@cobalt0.panici.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <17286.2662.128272.567592@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
- References: <20051118140737.GV6026@ns.snowman.net> <17278.5010.299720.27439@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <20051118174828.GX6026@ns.snowman.net> <20051118181448.GC30385@strugglers.net> <20051118185852.GY6026@ns.snowman.net> <17279.20568.616879.993525@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <20051119185625.GC6026@ns.snowman.net> <sa43blol1gr.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au> <20051123140809.GO6026@ns.snowman.net> <17286.2662.128272.567592@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:45:58PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So the best idea is indeed for
> downstream systems to have policies which are no more strict than
> upstream systems.
Would it be possible for master to make call-outs to chiark ?
would that solve the problem ?
Regards,
Paddy
--
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
Reply to: