[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED

On 10488 March 1977, Frank Küster wrote:

>>>>allrunes       dfsg
>>>>Please: Tell me its not true that the DFSG is used as a license there.
>>> As stated in the License file, this list was generated from the TeX
>>> Catalogue, which *can be wrong*! If you check the actual allrunes files,
>>> you see that it is LPPL.
>> I really hope you've done this --- for all files --- before uploading.
>> Also, there are several versions of the LPPL, at least one of which
>> might have DFSG issues.
> Note that teTeX is worse in this respect (#218105), and that having two
> (groups of) maintainers work on this will speed up resolving that bug,
> while rejecting texlive because it's copyright file is still not ideal
> will not.

Just because something else is worse than this isnt a reason to allow
another bad thing. That argumentation doesnt work.

bye Joerg
Mal verlierst Du und mal gewinnen die anderen: Immer im Wechsel!

Attachment: pgp3F_WGCsrcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: