Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> Norbert Preining wrote:
>
>>>allrunes dfsg
>>>
>>>Please: Tell me its not true that the DFSG is used as a license there.
>>
>>
>> As stated in the License file, this list was generated from the TeX
>> Catalogue, which *can be wrong*! If you check the actual allrunes files,
>> you see that it is LPPL.
>
> I really hope you've done this --- for all files --- before uploading.
> Also, there are several versions of the LPPL, at least one of which
> might have DFSG issues.
Note that teTeX is worse in this respect (#218105), and that having two
(groups of) maintainers work on this will speed up resolving that bug,
while rejecting texlive because it's copyright file is still not ideal
will not.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: