Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:14:38 +0100, Henning Makholm
<henning@makholm.net> wrote:
>Scripsit Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
>> I wouldn't use real base64, though, because it would mean that you can
>> use its hashed output as a file name.
>
>Good point. One might replace "/" with "_" and omit the final "=".
>Having a "+" in the hash should be safe in most contexts.
Isn't base62, which for example exim uses to create its message-ids, a
standard? I have never seen it outside exim.
Greetins
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: